Hitler's British Victory - How The Islamic-Socialist Monarchy Used the Jews to Conquer London

Something profound is unfolding in Britain, a shift that has not yet been fully articulated in contemporary discourse. While much has been written about the post-war transformations of Germany and France, Britain is undergoing a uniquely complex metamorphosis.

British author Douglas Murray has observed that Germany’s deep national guilt has been exported across Europe, and Britain may have absorbed it more intensely than any other country. This imported guilt has merged with a domestic shift in the background of ordinary Brits - much due to massive immigration. Many of these new immigrants, actually admire Hitler's Germany's treatment of the Jewish people, and see the British guilt, as a weakness, and an opportunity to turn Britain into a new type of country.

Britain’s Islamization, in a sense, represents a rediscovery of its monarchical instincts - but in an ironic twist, it does so through the lens of the outsider.

After centuries of evolving into a stable parliamentary democracy, Britain now seems to be reawakening a desire for hierarchy and uniformity, channeled not through its traditional institutions, but through other feudal vassal systems such as Islam and Socialism.

This is occurring following decades of nihilistic expression and social degradation - visible in British music, art, and etiquette from the 1960s through the 1990s. Hence, Britain is now seeking something more foundational. No wonder many young white Brits are converting to something which ought to stop the anthropy. 

Islamic-socialism, with its structurally hierarchical and symbolically rich alignment with monarchism, offers Britain a way to preserve its current collective guilt - while actively facilitating the symbolic transfer of the nation to its more 'worthy' non-English elements. Its distributive ethos ensures that no future British capitalist democracy will ever rise again.

Islamo-socialism will fuse post-colonial identity politics, anti-capitalism, and anti-Western narratives.

This emerging ideology has a clear antagonist: the land-owning Jew - both as a cultural archetype and in the political form of the State of Israel.

(Strikingly, even within Israel, the "land-owning Jew" is under cultural and political pressure)

Opposition to Israel is a powerful organizing force for Britain’s new political culture because It offers a unifying myth for a coalition that other than it's Feudal-Vassal nature lacks much cohesion. A way to bind disparate groups together through a common mythical enemy - for Islam - Jews. For Socialists - Bourgeoisie (Literally Jews In Marxist works). And for Post-Colonialists - Israel.

“The Jews” become the place where feelings of shame and anger that are at the root core of Monarchic-Islamo-Socialism, be them from the white angle, or a brown angle, can reach a unifying release. 

Multiculturalism can be sustained for realizing the Muslim Sensitivity of the issue, Post-colonial Equity can be reached through paying lip-service to the anti-israel rhetoric of the middle-class whites, and disdain to the jewish state has always been something not too un-british - hence the monarchistic structure is not shocked.

But in truth, the story runs deeper. In truth, the islamo-socialist wing wishes to see Britain through their interpretation of the jewish/israel question - they know, that they can conquer from within the monarchistic reading of the world and the British mindset - just like Hitler used the jews as a litmus test for bigger brighter plans for Germany as a whole. 

Meanwhile, Israel/Jews being a counter-myth requires ritual and symbol public denunciation and protest. We see this in recent performances that mix Islamic symbols, secular slogans, and British multicultural (Disgusting) aesthetics.

These are not isolated expressions; they are signs of a society attempting to construct a new self-image - one that, paradoxically, requires the symbolic defeat of its Jewish minority as proof of Cathatsis.

The reason lays in the fact that when a society enters a period of identity reconstruction, it often demands ideological conformity, and a common enemy.

In Germany, this came at the expense of the Jews, framed as enemies of the national project, the average german, who may not have been vehemently anti-semetic, was forced with a dilemma, "if the new german project means sacrificing the jews, are you willing to lose the national project for the sake of not answering correctly to our interpretation of the jewish question?. you cannot have both", most gave their silent answer. Same with the Question of israel and Zionism, for the Islamo-Socialists and their Monarchistic counterparts.

Today in Britain, if inclusion in the new multiculti identity requires Antisemitism - the society will tolerate it for the sake of the cohesion. The defeat of the Jews and Israel, culturally, politically, symbolically, historically, will not be seen as a tragedy, but a necessary step in the construction of Britain’s newfound self. If we endanger this new Britain, we may return to white supremacism and colonialism, there’s no other choice really.

it's a linear false-dichotomy historical equation that makes no sense to any sensible person. But given the Brits degraded national-self, it's right now, pathetically enough, the only options they are left with.

The Jews are just the Rubicon one cannot retreat from on the way back to old white England that shall never return.

This is why the radicalization of discourse around Israel is not about foreign policy. It’s about Britain itself — its values, its trajectory, and its soul.

It's Free-Palestine (Kill the Jews), Or a White British Empire - what other choice do you have left after all?

The brilliance of socialism and islam, be it via Marx, or through Hassan Al-Bana, is that they saw the Jew, as an element that once he is pushed out of the social cohesion order of natural equal rights, the open society itself, becomes way more vulnerable to radical transformation.

The reason lies in their understanding of the robust moral-sociological nature the Jews brought to the west. In that sense, Post-Colonialism, being Anti-Western, must also become Anti-Jewish. Because Jews have been agreed upon to be foundational to Westernism.

Just as much as Marxism and Islam negate Westernism - they will negate Judaism.

Once you can take this little-elder micro-cosmos of western civility outside the room - the rest will crumble.

All of these chaotic spectacles at anti-Israel events, must be seen in this larger context. Those participating often know they are acting in a larger struggle: not just against Israel, but as part of redefining the moral boundaries of Britain itself.

They are not just using the Palestinian cause; they are using it to fracture forver the limits of British identity. And they know it.